以下是同*文投资网相关人员的联络过程：2003/08/29 ****你好！ 很感谢你们平时的热心指导和专业提示！ 鉴于近期GFT交易系统出现的反常情况，我非常困惑，现将昨日遇到的不可思议之事email to you，请转告GFT给予答复。谢谢！ 2003/08/29 12:14:50以ITX方式1.0927卖出EUR/USD 1单，接着进行仓位保护，设置止损价1.0957及限价，按确认键后，约8、9分钟后工作中订单窗口仍无止损及限价订单，于是我再次进行仓位保护操作，设置止损价1.0957及限价，此后不到10妙钟，工作中订单窗口有了1.0957止损单及限价订单，13:15:57止损单被执行，亏损300元。但奇怪的是，13:15:59(2妙后)开盘仓位窗口自动出现一手1.09570买入EUR/USD，而且很快(不到2分钟)浮动亏损达到14点，我急忙对该单进行仓位保护处理，设置止损价1.0937及限价,（鉴于GFT操作平台频繁的故障，我已不敢用“闭市”立即平仓），14:05:55止损单被执行,额外亏损200元。 以前我对GFT公司服务质量及操作系统都很满意，但近期GFT多次出现的类似问题（闭市操作、ITX下单几分钟甚至10分钟不执行，也不显示任何结果等，让人焦急万分且束手无策），已严重动摇了我对GFT的信任，累计给我造成的损失约800元（含本次）。 所以我向GFT公司提出赔偿请求：补偿200USD的额外亏损费。 理由：此亏损由GFT操作系统造成，虽然我进行过两次"仓位保护"操作，但在1小时多的时间内，工作中订单窗口内只有1个止损订单及1个限价订单。而且对同一订单也不可能有2个止损订单及2个限价订单。 以上拜托尽快联络GFT公司回复，谢谢！2003/08/29 2003-8-29 12:14:50 DDL S 100,000.00借项 2003-9-2 EUR/USD 109,270.00贷项 1.092700 4704729 2003-8-29 13:15:57 STP B 100,000.00贷项 2003-9-2 EUR/USD 109,570.00借项 1.095700 4704750 2003-8-29 13:15:59 STP B 100,000.00贷项 2003-9-2 EUR/USD 109,570.00借项 1.095700 4704948 2003-8-29 14:05:55 STP S 100,000.00借项 2003-9-2 EUR/USD 109,370.00贷项 1.093700 4705421 [ 此消息由 沧海桑田 在 2004-06-24.00:04:19 编辑过 ]

2003/09/05内容： 很感谢***及*文投资网各位同仁的协助，不知2003/08/29针对GFT公司“赔偿请求”之事是否已办妥？ 从2003/08/29日发生不愉快事情后，我一直未做任何外汇买卖交易，Wednesday, September 03, 2003 11:01 PM 收*小姐的邮件后，稍微放心了些，又重新开始了对保证金交易的操作。但对于今晚GFT交易系统又出现的异常情况，我再次感到非常气愤，现将今日的不可思议之事email to you，请GFT给予尽快答复。谢谢！ 我09/04日晚1.3734买入USD/CAD，设止损1.3660.限价1.385。 09/05日晚约8:31我于1.3739对该单进行“收市”操作，此时工作中订单出现“收市单”，但一直持续约7分钟没变化，此时工作中订单窗口有“止损单”、“限价单”及“收市单”三个有效订单，而此几分钟内USD狂跌至1.366上下，且剧烈变化，我面对三个订单再次束手无策，因为：1.如果我取消“止损单”，而万一“收市单”并未成交，岂不是损失无法控制。2.如果不取消“止损单”而“收市单”又已生效，那么当USD跌到1.366时，GFT系统将自动生成一个1.366卖出USD/CAD的订单，而这并不是所计划及希望的。约7分钟后“收市单”消失，浮动盈利已变为零，我从资金余额判定，“收市单”已生效，但此时更恐怖的事情发生了：“止损单”仍在工作中订单窗口中，且工作中订单窗口的“止损单”已不能取消（按滑鼠左键，“取消”项已不能执行），更气愤的是“止损单”一直留在工作中订单窗口中，亦即明知“止损单”已自动生成一个1.366卖出USD/CAD的订单你也无法将其平仓出局。约又过了9分钟后（距我“收市”操作已约16分钟，此时我已拨通了*文投资网*小姐的分机电话，此时*小姐已下班，好像是一位姓关的Mr.接的电话），“止损单”消失，开盘仓位中出现一个1.366卖出USD/CAD的订单，而此时USD/CAD已涨到了1.3684，我只好再次“收市”出局，额外亏损24点（近180元）。 现我又一次向GFT公司提出赔偿请求：赔偿180USD的额外亏损费。包括8/29的赔偿请求共380USD。 理由：此亏损由GFT系统造成，而且因为GFT系统的原因，看到悲剧将发生也无法避免。 thanks & best regards 2003/09/05

2003/09/11 Hello, Miss * thanks for your help！ this translation is wonderful,contact GFT please! 另，强烈建议*文投资网，安排相关外汇人员晚上值班以便能及时处理客户遇到 的问题。（当晚，当工作中订单窗口的“收市”已消失，而“止损单”又不能取消时， 我拨通了的*文投资网的电话找*小姐主管，当时是一位男的 接的电话，说*小姐已离开，于是我向他反应了情况，他说他不是负责这方面的，不能 处理，叫我周一再打电话过来找*小姐。－－以上电话内容无录音，但通话时间电信有 记录） 2003/09/11

原文由 沧海桑田 发表: 一下你同*文投资网相关人员的联络过程：2003/08/29 ****你好！ 很感谢你们平时的热心指导和专业提示！ 鉴于近期GFT交易系统出现的反常情况，我非常困惑，现将昨日遇到的不可思议之事email to you，请转告GFT给......

呵呵，一個曲形的重複動作的例子… 今年，我就在大行情做了一次加單動作… 第一次要等30分鐘後才給我，第二次也要等幾分鐘，但我當時很清醒的知道自己在做什么，也在咒罵著——你不給我，我就更賺多點… 然後，我兩單總共賺了百多點… 也試過止損單被打了後(看價得知)，卻不給成交，最後以為沒事了，又突然的被進行止損了… GFT系統有一個嚴重毛病(可能其他系統也有同樣情況)，就是不給交易的單不顯示也不能取消，這就很容易的造成了錯覺——以為自己點錯了，就會不自覺的重點一次，什至多次… 電腦是沒人性的，他不會跟你商量，這單是不是不小心啊之類的… 所以，他只會按程式運行，多了出來的單子，就按新單看待，也有可能不給(前者我未試過，後者我試過一次，當時我清楚知道我是按錯了的，但不知何顧，他又若無其事，沒有給成交)… 這是我直到現時為止，沒信心把大額賬戶轉移到網上交易的原因——不論是大銀行還是小經紀，都會出這出那的問題，不一而足… 按筆者所言，應該是忙中慌亂造成的，又不幸的，全給成交了… 在這里，我只想說，每個新的交易系統，大家也要問清楚，試清楚其內容和功能，才好實際下單… 也請大家遇到這種事，千萬不可以亂來，以為多按幾下，就一定能做到… 從法律上說，這很難向GFT索償的… 因為在每個網上交易的「風險披露聲明」中，必定有一個因為網絡、行情等因素而中斷的連接做成的損失，不具有負擔責任等等的說明… 唯一有可能做到讓對方賠償的，就是死咬著中文投資網的客服有誤導成份，導至了不正常的損失——但得有兩個前題，一、你要清楚知道客服的姓名，而且由開戶到現在也是同一個人，二要清楚的說明客服沒有說明白系統交易的關鍵——這得要証據說明他們刻意的不談利害關係… 如果且備了上面兩個條件，則有機會從民事索償中得到賠償… [ 此消息由 leo 在 2004-06-23.17:54:09 编辑过 ]

2003/09/12 收到关于USD/CAD的索赔175元 ******** 非常感谢你们将我的索赔请求 及时准确地翻译并联络GFT公司。关于第二笔索赔请求，虽然***今天下午详细分析了报表情况，一直认为是中国网络的原因，我也觉得有一定道理。但当我下午再度确认交易报表并查看USD/CAD，09/05日走势图时，发现USD从1.3739跌向1.3660估计只有3～5分钟时间，而从交易记录来看，从收市价1.3739成交到止损价1.366成交却相距7分29妙，说明GFT系统确实有问题，故仍不会放弃该索赔。可喜的是当晚上我再登录我的帐户，发现帐户的Eq已增加175元，我相信这正是***准确翻译及不懈努力，向GFT公司索赔的结果，是*文投资网维护客户利益的结果，对此我深表谢意！同时也请贵公司再接再厉，尽快联络GFT公司处理好第一笔索赔请求。 对于第一笔索赔，虽然操作中我进行过两次"仓位保护"操作，但在1小时多的时间内，工作中订单窗口内只显示了1个止损订单及1个限价订单，而当从未在工作中订单窗口内出现过的第二个止损单被反向执行成一手1.0957买入EUR/USD时却短暂地（约2～3秒）出现在工作中订单窗口，然后消失，并出现在开盘仓位窗口中，由此看来，几秒钟后即将成交的订单会出现在工作中订单窗口，而一小时前下的止损及限价订单却从没有出现在工作中订单窗口，故不论用正向思维还是逆向思维方式，以及用三个代表思想指导下的最高级的共产主义思维方式都无法想通这一道理，所以对于***认为这仍是中国网络问题之意见，我实在不敢苟同。 thanksandbest regards! 2003/09/12

GFT的ITX是很有问题的。 建议在图表中点鼠标右键，然后再点sell or buy下单，这样可能不太会跑点。我在迷你帐号中，最近操作了几次，基本上都没跑点，就是要1分钟才知道成交。

2003/09/14 Miss ** 以下是关于第一次200USD索赔请求中关于当时的发生过程及索赔理由的英文描述，请不要改动其内容联络GFT公司，进行索赔申请。谢谢！ On 12:14:50 08/29/2003 I sold ONE lot EUR/USD at the price of 1.0927 successfully with ITX mode, and then i set the limit price and stop price (1.0957), but there are no stop order and limit order in working order windows about 8-9 minutes after I set, at that time I thought maybe the orders were not executed automatically by the system, and so i set the same stop price and limit price again, after 10 seconds, there were ONLY ONE limit price and ONLY ONE stop price in the working orders. On 13:15:57 stop order(1.0957) was executed automatically, i lost USD300.00.but after 2 seconds(13:15:59),in open position window, there was 1 lot buy EUR/USD at the price of 1.0957,and at that time, the price of EUR/USD went down quickly, and within 2 minutes, there was 14 pips of EUR/USD lost, and then I HAVE TO set the stop price at 1.0937(for the frequent disorder of GFT recently, I DARE NOT TO USE"CLOSE AT THE MARKET PRICE"ORDER),14:05:55 the stop order(1.0937) was executed automatically, i lost another USD200.00. BECAUSE OF DISORDER OF GFT PLATFORM, THERE WERE NO FEEDBACK OF STOP PRICE AND LIMIT PRICE AFTER I SET IN THE FIRST TIME IN THE WORKING ORDERS WINDOWS, I CAN NOT KNOW WHETHER THE FIRST STOP PRICE ORDER AND LIMIT PRICE ORDER DONE OR NOT IN TIME, UNDER SUCH CIRCUMSTANCE, I HAD TO SET THE SAME STOP PRICE AND LIMIT PRICE AGAIN, SO I LOST ANOTHER USD200 THAT I SHOULD NOT LOST. BY THE WAY, WITHIN ONE HOUR, THERE WERE ONLY ONE STOP PRICE AND LIMIT PRICE IN THE WORKING ORDER WINDOW. 2003-8-29 12:14:50 DDL S 100,000.00借项 2003-9-2 EUR/USD 109,270.00贷项 1.092700 4704729 2003-8-29 13:15:57 STP B 100,000.00贷项 2003-9-2 EUR/USD 109,570.00借项 1.095700 4704750 2003-8-29 13:15:59 STP B 100,000.00贷项 2003-9-2 EUR/USD 109,570.00借项 1.095700 4704948 2003-8-29 14:05:55 STP S 100,000.00借项 2003-9-2 EUR/USD 109,370.00贷项 1.093700 4705421 2003/09/14

2003/10/20*文投资网的答复 Hi, *****, What I said in the email is that you can give me more detailed information. So, we can have enough reasons to argue with GFT. Thanks & B.rgds. Chinesefn

2003/10/20给*文投资网的邮件： Hello，Miss ** 在以前的邮件中我已多次声明了我的理由: 第一 . GFT系统允许对同一订单进行两次以上止损和限价操作本身就是一种逻辑错误－－难道止损之后再止损？限价之后再限价？逻辑上能讲得通吗？ 第二 . 工作中订单窗口是显示工作中订单以便客户确认的窗口，我所下止损订单、限价订单始终未显示在工作中订单窗口，而GFT却认为系统没问题。 more detailed information: 虽然当日操作中我进行过两次"仓位保护"操作，但在1小时多的时间内，工作中订单窗口内只显示了1个止损订单及1个限价订单，而当从未在工作中订单窗口内出现过的第二个止损单被反向执行成一手1.0957买入EUR/USD时却短暂地（约2～3秒）出现在工作中订单窗口，然后消失，并出现在开盘仓位窗口中，由此看来，几秒钟后即将成交的订单会出现在工作中订单窗口，而一小时前下的止损及限价订单却从没有出现在工作中订单窗口。工作中订单窗口是显示工作中订单以便客户确认的窗口，我所下止损订单、限价订单始终未显示在工作中订单窗口，而GFT却认为系统没问题？因当时没想到GFT系统会犯这种逻辑上的错误（对同一订单进行两次以上止损和限价操作），而且这样的逻辑错误又未能显示在工作中订单窗口，故未用相机将这一奇观拍摄下来，如果有下次，我一定用400万象素数码相机将其记录下来留作纪念。 不知以上的detailed information 是否够detailed，我搞不懂你们需要怎样的detailed information？我认为就第一条理由GFT就不能给出满意解释。

ITX据说是二道贩子，交易时还是要点击GFT的报价

特别注意：！！ 203/10/23GFT的答复，请特别注意：用2003/09/05发生USD/CAD的交易记录来拒绝2003/08/29发生EUR/USD索赔请求。荒唐！！而且从此至今无如何答复－－包括一句简单的“sorry”。 Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 2:32 AM Subject: RE:complaint and compensate >; Dear **, >; It would be illogical not to allow clients to be able to set up multiple >; stops and limits.Clients may have multiple entry and exit strategies >; that they wish to take advantage of - if multiple stops and limits were >; not allowed, this could not be done.Multiple stops and limits can be >; created and it is up to the client to make sure that the orders wanted >; are entered - including canceling any pending order that was placed and >; then not desired. >; >; The disputed stop and limit orders must have appeared in the client's >; working orders window.Otherwise, the client would not have been able >; to modify the stop and limit as he did.To refresh, here is the >; activity history: >; >; Sep 4, 2003 4:42:46 PM 4733876 *** issued new DirectDeal >; order #4733876: BUY 100000 USD/CAD @ 1.3734 >; Sep 4, 2003 4:42:56 PM 4733876 23138 By jfrazine Filled order #4733876: >; BUY 100,000.0 USD/CAD @ 1.3734, valuedate=05-SEP-03 >; Sep 4, 2003 4:46:01 PM 4733889 *** issued new Stop order >; #4733889: SELL 100000 USD/CAD @ 1.367 >; Sep 4, 2003 4:46:01 PM 4733890 **** issued new Limit order >; #4733890: SELL 100000 USD/CAD @ 1.382, oco # 4733889 >; >; Sep 5, 2003 2:07:12 AM 4733890 **** modify order >; #4733890ld price=1.382, old vol=1, new price=1.379, new vol=1 >; Sep 5, 2003 11:30:58 AM 4733890 **** modify order >; #4733890ld price=1.379, old vol=1, new price=1.382, new vol=1 >; Sep 5, 2003 11:31:11 AM 4733889 **** modify order >; #4733889ld price=1.367, old vol=1, new price=1.366, new vol=1 >; Sep 5, 2003 12:01:34 PM 4733890 **** modify order >; #4733890ld price=1.382, old vol=1, new price=1.386, new vol=1 >; Sep 5, 2003 12:31:04 PM 4739398 **** issued new Market >; order #4739398: SELL 100000 USD/CAD @ 1.3739 >; Sep 5, 2003 12:37:44 PM 4739398 23138 By khoeksema Filled order >; #4739398: SELL 100,000.0 USD/CAD @ 1.3739, valuedate=08-SEP-03 >; Sep 5, 2003 12:42:47 PM 4733890By **** Cancelled order >; #4733890: SELL USD/CAD @ , valuedate= >; Sep 5, 2003 12:45:13 PM 4733889 23138 By khoeksema Filled order >; #4733889: SELL 100,000.0 USD/CAD @ 1.366, valuedate=08-SEP-03 >; >; The only way to modify stops and limits in the platform is through the >; working orders window.This is also the only way to cancel pending >; orders, as Mr. **** did to order #4733889. >; >; Once again, the system executed the trades as entered by the client.If >; the client has any question about pending or open positions on a live >; account, please call the Dealing Desk immediately. >; Thank you, >; Global Forex Trading

2003/10/31日我给*文投资网的邮件： Hello，Miss ** 对于GFT以下的回复我不知怎么形容好，直看得我云里雾里，只好“把酒问青天：不知天上宫阙，今夕是何年”。心想，订单都没出现在窗口，我又怎么可能对其进行修改，难道在做梦？而且从Autumn所讲语气明显暗指我事实面前撒谎。请看： Autumn said ：“The disputed stop and limit orders must have appeared in the client'sworking orders window.Otherwise, the client would not have been able to modify the stop and limit as he did.To refresh, here is the activity history: ....... Sep 5, 2003 11:31:11 AM 4733889 **** modify order#4733889ld price=1.367, old vol=1, new price=1.366, new vol=1 The only way to modify stops and limits in the platform is through theworking orders window.This is also the only way to cancel pendingorders, as Mr. *** did to order #4733889.” but, 这里所讲activity history是我的第二件索赔内容（2003/09/05发生USD/CAD），且GFT已经将第二件索赔内容的款项赔付给了我，与现在我们争论的第一件索赔内容（2003/08/29发生EUR/USD）并不相关！！！ 发生以上“时光倒流”－－我暂且称之为误会，不知是GFT对客户太不负责，把两个并不相关的内容胡乱搅在一起，还是中文投资网没将索赔情况给GFT解释清楚？Dear Autumn 的回复是email to你们的同时抄送给我的，难道你们就没看看里面的内容，没觉得奇怪吗（不是Dear Autumn奇怪就是我奇怪，总之，必定有一人讲的内容很奇怪）？ 我觉得象现在东拉西扯的联络真是在浪费大家的时间，继续这样的争论已没多大意义，如果GFT拒赔，请中文投资网给我办理销户事宜，但我仍然保留将来时机成熟时再向GFT索赔及投诉的权利。 >; 以上，拜托！ >; 2003/10/30[ 此消息由 沧海桑田 在 2004-06-24.00:13:30 编辑过 ]

FXCM，CMS，Oanda都没这种问题，做多就是断断线之类。 换个公司得了。

Sorry，晚上继续！（我编辑过的贴只是删除了姓名及账号，未改任何其它数据资料）[ 此消息由 沧海桑田 在 2004-06-24.00:16:14 编辑过 ]

多次询问，仍然毫无结果－－几个月没结果，如人间蒸发了一般。 To: "Chinesefn <;[email protected]>; Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2003 10:10 PM Subject: Fw: Fw: Fw: complaint and compensate >; Today is 2003/11/27,How about the result?how long do I have to wait for the result ? thanks! >; ----- Original Message ----- >; From: "forex " <;[email protected]>; >; To: " >; Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 10:57 PM >; Subject: Re: Fw:complaint and compensate >; >; >; Hi, ****, >; >; I am sorry I have not received any result yet. I reminded GFT before. >; >; B.rgds., >; Lan >; ---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- >; From: >; Date:Thu, 20 Nov 2003 22:36:56 +0800 >; >; >;Today is 2003/11/20,How about the result?thanks! >; >; >; >;----- Original Message ----- >; >;From: "forex " <;[email protected]>; >; >;To: " >; >;Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 6:46 PM >; >;Subject: Re: Fw: complaint and compensate >; >;Hi, ****, >; >;I have not got any result from GFT. PLease wait. >; >; >; >;Thanks & B.rgds. >; >;Lan >; >;---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- >; >;From: " >; >;Date:Tue, 11 Nov 2003 12:45:36 +0800 >; >; >; >;>;How about the result? >; >;>;thanks! >; >;>;----- Original Message ----- >; >;>;From: >; >;>;To: Chinesefn >; >;>;Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 2:34 PM >; >;>;Subject: complaint and compensate >; >;>; >; >;>; >; >;>;How about the result? >; >;>;thanks! >; >;>;----- Original Message ----- >; >;>;From: >; >;>;To: Chinesefn >; >;>;Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 1:11 PM >; >;>;Subject: Fw:complaint and compensate >; >;>; >; >;>; >; >;>;----- Original Message ----- >; >;>;From: >; >;>;To: "Chinesefn °" <;[email protected]>;; >; >;>;Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 10:46 AM >; >;>;Subject: Fw: **** complaint and compensate

2003/12/05GFT的来信，再次用2003/09/05发生USD/CAD的交易记录来说明2003/08/29发生EUR/USD索赔请求，其不负责任之极，让人叹为观止！ Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 3:29 AM >; >; Subject: RE: complaint and compensate >; >; >; >; >; >; ***, >; >; >; >; There has been repeated correspondence between you and myself in regards to account 23138.Please refer to the following: >; >; >; >; 10/22/2003 2:32 PM | Autumn Kronemeyer >; >; Dear Lan, >; >; >; >; It would be illogical not to allow clients to be able to set up multiple stops and limits. Clients may have multiple entry and exit strategies that they wish to take advantage of - if multiple stops and limits were not allowed, this could not be done. Multiple stops and limits can be created and it is up to the client to make sure that the orders wanted are entered - including canceling any pending order that was placed and then not desired. >; >; >; >; The disputed stop and limit orders must have appeared in the client's working orders window. Otherwise, the client would not have been able to modify the stop and limit as he did. To refresh, here is the activity history: >; >; >; >; Sep 4, 2003 4:42:46 PM 4733876 **** issued new DirectDeal order #4733876: BUY 100000 USD/CAD @ 1.3734 >; >; Sep 4, 2003 4:42:56 PM 4733876 23138 By jfrazine Filled order #4733876: BUY 100,000.0 USD/CAD @ 1.3734, valuedate=05-SEP-03 >; >; Sep 4, 2003 4:46:01 PM 4733889 **** issued new Stop order #4733889: SELL 100000 USD/CAD @ 1.367 >; >; Sep 4, 2003 4:46:01 PM 4733890 **** issued new Limit order #4733890: SELL 100000 USD/CAD @ 1.382, oco # 4733889 >; >; >; >; Sep 5, 2003 2:07:12 AM 4733890 **** modify order #4733890ld price=1.382, old vol=1, new price=1.379, new vol=1 >; >; Sep 5, 2003 11:30:58 AM 4733890 **** modify order #4733890ld price=1.379, old vol=1, new price=1.382, new vol=1 >; >; Sep 5, 2003 11:31:11 AM 4733889 **** modify order #4733889ld price=1.367, old vol=1, new price=1.366, new vol=1 >; >; Sep 5, 2003 12:01:34 PM 4733890 **** modify order #4733890ld price=1.382, old vol=1, new price=1.386, new vol=1 >; >; Sep 5, 2003 12:31:04 PM 4739398 **** issued new Market order #4739398: SELL 100000 USD/CAD @ 1.3739 >; >; Sep 5, 2003 12:37:44 PM 4739398 23138 By khoeksema Filled order #4739398: SELL 100,000.0 USD/CAD @ 1.3739, valuedate=08-SEP-03 >; >; Sep 5, 2003 12:42:47 PM 4733890 23138 By **** Cancelled order #4733890: SELL USD/CAD @ , valuedate= >; >; Sep 5, 2003 12:45:13 PM 4733889 23138 By khoeksema Filled order #4733889: SELL 100,000.0 USD/CAD @ 1.366, valuedate=08-SEP-03 >; >; >; >; The only way to modify stops and limits in the platform is through the working orders window. This is also the only way to cancel pending orders, as Mr. *** did to order #4733889. >; >; >; >; Once again, the system executed the trades as entered by the client. If the client has any question about pending or open positions on a live account, please call the Dealing Desk immediately. >; >; >; >; Thank you, >; >; Global Forex Trading

2003/12/05我给*文投资网的回复： 中文投资网的领导同志们：我还没打算将这些笑话公布在网上，请不要逼我。thanks！ ----- Original Message ----- From: To: "Miss<;[email protected]>; Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 10:28 AM Subject: Fw: complaint and compensate >; 他们脑子有问题呀？用同一荒唐的论据再次解释这一问题？（再次用Sep 4, 2003 USD/CAD 的操作记录解释2003/08/29发生的EUR/USD操作）。

我2003/12/05给*文投资网的邮件： Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 1:21 PM Subject: Re: hello 还好，我现在还能控制自己。不过如果*小姐或GFT再来刺激我，我就不知道我的忍耐止损点是否会被触发。毕竟多次使用“时光倒流、阴阳错位”的功夫杀伤力太大。 GFT东一个"It is impossible" 西一个"It would be illogical" 真让人受不了。难道你们连给GFT指出那些低级错误的胆量都没有吗？

我2004/06/10给*文投资网的邮件： ----- Original Message ----- From: To: "Chinesefn<;[email protected]>;; ***@fn168.com>; Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 12:53 AM Subject: 亲自去GFT索赔 >; 几个月过去了，我一直在等你们的答复，但却如泥石牛入海。如此的工作效率和态度实在不敢恭维。 >; 现在我已经拿到了**移民的签证，随时可以移民去**。如果我离开中国前还没收到满意的索赔，到**后，在我自认为条件成熟时，我将就这一荒唐答复直接向GFT公司抗议及索赔，或者亲自去GFT公司索赔。因为保证金不受中国法律保护，且中国人易被欺负，但我相信作为一个**人可能情况就很不一样了。

JUST AN IB, HOW DARE THEY?